"We [the bankers] must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4^th [1892], our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination [conspiracy] and legislation.

The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."

In order to warn Americans, the1892 Bankers’ Manifesto was revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917.

"Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd. Thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves what has been generally planned and successfully accomplished."

The Bankers’ Manifesto ties in with the U.S. Senate Document No. 43, 73^rd Congress, 1^st Session (1934), which states: "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called ‘ownership’ is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere ‘user’ and use must be in acceptance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State."

The 2005 Supreme Court Ruling on Eminent Domain also ties into the above U.S. Senate Document.

A LANDMARK DECISION

Disadvantages of the Reverse Mortgage

LAND PATENT = "the highest evidence of title, and is a final determination of the existence of all facts." Walton vs. United States, 415 F. 876 (1917) "The land patent is the muniment [evidence] of title, such title being absolute in its nature, making the sovereigns absolute freeholders on their land." McConnell vs. Wilcox, 1 Scam. (III.) 381, 396 (1837).

"The patent alone passes land from the United States to the grantee and nothing passes a perfect title to public lands but a patent."

"The right to the ownership of property and to contract with respect of its use is unalienable." Golding vs. Schubac, 93 U.S. 32: Saville vs. Corless, 46 U.S. 495

"In case of ejectment, where the question is who has the legal title, the patent of the government is unassailable." Sanford vs. Sanford, 139 U.S. 642

"All real estate owners—including people in the city—should have a land patent to protect their interest in the land. Without this title there is little protection today. Hopefully, if enough landowners file for a land patent and re-declare this patent in their own name, this act may force a swing in public policy because of the force of numbers involved. An influx of requests for land patents at the several land management offices is bound to reverberate in Washington. The drum beat of people seeking to defend themselves against those who would make them homeless might even bring public policy into focus on the parity issue, for it has been the debauchery of agriculture via a lack of parity that accounted for so much farm capital consumption, and massive waves of rural bankruptcy in the first place. The land patent is an instrument born of law. Full understanding of why all devices available must be used to preserve the land in the hands of individuals can be gained only in the shade of a learning tree called parity."

S. Jay Stewart, Land Patents: Memorandum of Law, History, Force, and Effect of the Land Patent

Each individual American landowner can research "land patents" on the internet and determine for self the route you would like to take in re-declaring the land patent affecting your property—be it located in the city or in rural areas. The websites on which you may find this article posted are not qualified to advise you.

Nancy B. Detweiler

www.pathwaytoascension.com